How to Defeat An Organized Movement of Sheepe

What Do J6 and the General Strike of 1934 Have in Common?

The criminal network that operates behind the veil of a democracy has a well-worn playbook on how to discredit any movement that threatens their monopoly on power, resources and wealth. The General Strike of 1934 and J6 protesters both got the textbook treatment. It’s time we learn our lessons!

Much of the criminal behavior taking place in a democracy is disguised. We all need a bit of training on how to spot the way in which wolves, working together in a pack, eliminate opposition to their non-stop consolidating and monopolizing behavior. Note the patterns for yourself and teach them to your children and be wiser for the future. The good news is, there are only so many tricks in the bag from which the elites draw, to beat you. Once I show you the pattern, or storyline, you’ll be able to sniff out historical examples on your own and be smart about how to engage in any future protest.

If you are hard pressed to remember anything about the general strike of 1934, don’t feel bad, my public education schooling wasn’t any better.

But first, I am going to lay out the general pattern.

---

⚠️ DISCREDIT THE MOVEMENT PATTERN: Paint the protesting/striking sheep as “wolves”

---

Keys To Success:

• Make sure that you don’t have adequate police support prior to an event.

• Have infiltrators steer the event to violence

• The press is poised to blame the sheep for the violence which throws a negative light on the movement’s goals.

• The press affix labels to the group that coincide with the devil terms [1] of that era.(”Communists” for 1934; “Domestic Terrorists” for 2021)

• The police are on the scene to arrest and beat up the protesting/striking sheep or allow the infiltrators/ vigilantes to do it. Arrests are then made. The purpose of which is to 1) give the sheep a good scare and 2) keep them from ever attempting something so foolish as trying to better their lives in the future.

• If this sounds mob-like, reprehensible and criminal… it’s because, it is.

At this point you might feel the need to query, “Why would an enemy do this?” Afterall, don’t they risk the truth getting out, boomaranging back, and discrediting them? That’s a great point and of course, there is only one answer. They can not argue the situation on the merits. Nothing short of discrediting the opponent will do. It’s weak and pathetic, undoubtedly.

But, because the press is on the home team and sure to support the desired narrative while simultaneously lobbing deragatory devil terms [1] at would-be truth seekers- they can usually get away with it, at least with 95% of the population. Additionally, key police personnel are bought off and sure to perform as needed whenever someone with a press pass sticks a microphone in front of them.

General Strike 1934

In 1934, the Longshoremen of San Francisco made reasonable demands to control their hiring halls and be allowed to bargain collectively through leaders of their own choosing. After several months, they gained support of other big unions and a general stike was called. The strike was progressing quietly and effectively.

When Hugh Johnson, head of the NRA, arrived in town, he was eager to grant the request of the general strike committee. That is, until the “Newspaper Publisher’s Council” got ahold of him. The Council had been established by the newspapers so they could act together. And their first order of business was to make sure that the mayor, working with the state, did NOT institute martial law.

Secondly, they bashed the strikers in their editorials stating that, “the strike was a revolution against constituted authority,” and implied that the radicals had got hold of the unions, both abject lies.

By the next morning, Johnson had completely changed his tune, calling the strike “ a threat to the community,” “ civil war,” “a bloody insurrection,” and “a blow at the flag of our common country.”

Johnson declared that, if the government did not act, the people would. Soon after, “vigilantes,” appeared on the scene and with the police abetting them, were smashing private property, destroying the headquarters of the unions, communists, and the “radical” newspapers.

At the end of the night, the police had arrested hundreds of people— without warrant. They were beat up and thrown in jail. According to witnesses, the police themselves were the most destructive but the papers continued to denouce the union men for the lawless conduct. One honest judge released eighty men where not a shred of evidence could be found linking them to any crimes.

J6

The events of January 6th, 2021 are cut of the same cloth. For those paying attention, National Guard requests were denied prior to the event; barrier fences cut down to allow the crowd wider access to the capital; government infiltrators such as the notorious Ray Epps actively incited the crowd; Capital police were caught on tape letting protestors in the building; and the non-violent crowd was fired upon to incite them to violence. Hundreds were arrested days after the event and have been jailed awaiting some type of justice. Some have even been abused in jail.

Immediately that day, the press and politicians jumped into action mischaracterizing the protest calling it a “deadly insurrection,” labeling the protestors as “domestic terrorists” and refusing to deviate one iota from their skewed narrative to allow for mountains of contradictory evidence, now accumulated, to correct the record.

Implications

If we can no longer protest without risking this betrayal and hostility being visited upon us and our children: if politicians are no longer responsive to constituents; if the press is an agent of a cabel looting your future and destroying your country, what is to be done? Certainly to use the word, “democracy” is to be wildly inaccurate.

What I have attempted to demonstrate is that J6 was not an isolated event. Things are as bad as they are now because this has been going on for more than one hundred years!!! We need to face the fact that there is a playbook that can nullify any movement forming against their interests and be the wiser.

The PROBLEM of the news —their alliance with power and the betrayal of a noble heritage — is not new. It was and has been THE MOST PRESSING ISSUE of the 21 century and remains urgent to this day.

Yes, of course we have alternative news attempting to do the job the media is not doing, but it’s haphazard; a thousand babbling voices including lunatics, frauds and infiltrators. When sane people look for alternatives what do they find? It’s not easy to find your way through this disparate collection of unorganized voices working to distribute truth to the masses.

How can we network these sources and vet them without being ourselves fact checkers and arbitors of truth?

These are thorny but urgent questions! It is not okay to keep going on in this manner. Discussions are needed at the supper tables and when friends in liberty get together. Let’s stop wasting time talking about the nonsense current events that are distracting us from the real problems.

Dot-Connecting Discussion Questions

• The strike occured in Roosevelt’s first term. Remember the New Deal? It was all about helping the common man. Johnson was appointed Head of the National Recovery Act, by Roosevelt, yet he acted decidedly on behalf of big business. Why?

• On whose behalf was the press acting? Were they merely acting out of self interest to protect advertising revenue? (In other words, they were being squeezed to do what they did) Or should the press be considered part and parcel of the cabal?

• My sources were two honest journalists of the time, George Seldes and Oswald Villard, who were unafraid to tell the story. Unfortunately, the only means to tell the story in 1934 was to write a book, speak to small crowds or hope that a magazine would print an article or two. Seldes book came out in 1935 but Villard’s book wasn’t published until 1944.

• Is it possible to win against a corrupt press even now with immediate refutation of narratives available but pitted against ever expanding social media and search engine censorship?

The arrangement of this post is meant to serve a duel purpose; that of providing useful adjunct training material to teach young adults. The material can serve as a mini-learning assignment where your child is asked to dig into the original sources; learn more about either of the events and even to find other possible historical examples. Can you see the possibilities? Hands-on learning will help them remember the pattern and to watch for it.

This material dovetails nicely with the One Idea to Rule Them All: Reverse Engineering American Propaganda study guide to be found at Smartsheepe.com. Watch for the printed version of this study guide to be released soon.

Please let me know how these could be improved as they are put into practice.

[1] If you don’t know what devil terms are see One Idea to Rule Them All: Reverse Engineering American Propaganda in the Chapter, War on Words.

Sources:

San Francisco's Press and the 1934 General Strike by George Seldes in Freedom of the Press.

Oswald Garrison Villard in The Disappearing Daily: Chapters in American Newspaper Evolution. p 15-17.